In response to this question, I am inclined to believe that
bias/subjectivity is an inevitable part of the news. First and foremost because Gladstone, in her
work, “The Influencing Machine,” dedicates pages 61-70 for outlining “the
biases [she] believes [we] should
worry about” (Gladstone 61). While
speculative, I am sure that she would not take the time to do such if she did
not believe that bias/subjectivity was an inevitable part of the news. Secondly, Gladstone goes on to assert that
commercial bias is the biggest bias because “news needs conflict and momentum”
(Gladstone 62) so that the news stays new.
When observing news outlets, they “too rarely follow up on stories they’ve
already reported” (Gladstone 62). In my
own experience when watching the news, I too feel as though the stories being
reported on last much longer than necessary.
One example is a local tire-slasher in Philadelphia. Over Christmas break a man was arrested for
slashing tires across the southern district of Philadelphia. By the end of Christmas breaking, having
heard this story daily, for more than a week and a half, I thought the story
would be put to rest. I remember going
home for mid-Winter recess and hearing a news report about this man’s trial and
how he was claiming mental insanity for slashing people’s tires – the story was
not terminated for week almost two months, according to my mom. These stories appeal to the human nature that
craves the sensational news deviating from the factual and becoming that similar
to a novel.
Finally,
bias/subjectivity is an inevitable part of the news because news is a subset of
the media, thus it is an enterprise. The
goal of an enterprise is to gain capital, therefore by using the commercial
bias or any of the biases, which Gladstone outlines; a news outlet is
attempting to maximize their capital gain by obtaining higher viewer
ratings. In short, these biases help to
expand viewer demographic thus fulfilling the latter. Bias is inevitable simple
because of the nature of the news, human nature and, frankly, because Gladstone
asserts such an argument.
-Akaash Agarwal
-Akaash Agarwal